Philosophy 101

According to philosophy, each individual interacts with their own individual world. That is to say that, a person with colour-blindness sees a red ball as green. But in a room full of colour blind people, the ball is actually green.

This is the secret of the music industry and why they control what is perceived as “good music”.

I understand that the music industry survives on selling its music. I also understand that they are selling a package, the “artists” are a commodity and they have to make them appealing to as many people as possible. But, I believe that the general public need to hear good music. Original songs, with lyrics that make sense and Rhythm, Melody and Harmony.

People like Jamie Cullum and to a lesser extent Michael Buble have gone a long way toward changing the public psyche with regards to what is good, popular music, but they will never have the same kind of backing as the more edgy, dangerous and very unhealthy people they tend to highlight.Which is a shame, because they do use genuine musicians, they can perform  live and they have spent time learning their craft.

Don’t get me wrong, I have noticed a vast increase of new bands in other genres who are genuine musicians and who I am not including in this commentary. I am focusing on more on the Pop Genre.

At the end of the day, the music companies tell the public what is good music and what is not….. So if the people in music companies genuinely love music, why not steer them toward real artists who can at least play an instrument or sing the right note.

4 thoughts on “Philosophy 101

  1. Nice new blog, thoughtful, well done. I played music a few years back (1964-72) though mostly now I just listen, but I feel I can comment.

    First I would separate playing music – like participating in sport or being an athlete – from listening to music – watching sport or following a team. Different point of view, so I will park that for the moment. Also I don’t think there is any objective test for “good” music, merely what we like or don’t like. I know I think talent-show stuff is crap but teenage girls are screaming for their heartthrob, they are entitled to.

    I am inclined towards a “social anthropology” view of music – how people use in in their lives – than a philosphy of music. How people use it seems to me to come in two very important life stages – “Youth” and “post Youth”.

    In Youth, its a soundtrack to the hormonal-fuelled passage to adulthood: tribes, fashions, friends, dancing, dating and mating, luurve, annoying your parents. For some people it never advances beyond that, but switches into “nostalgia for youth”. (I know a few guys in their 60’s still listening to punk or dance, embarrassing) Youth is where the industry makes its money, nothing wrong with that – no one makes you buy anything. It’s a commodity, just not for me. I like other commodities.

    For others of us, in adulthood, music is an adventure. In your metaphor, the many and varied languages of music. I have had forty years of post-Youth listening and I never listen to the music of my youth, but made my way through every imaginable genre, culture and style, (before currently settled, for some time, on jazz). All the time you are adding context and experience to each new thing you listen to, with increasing pleasure.

    At seventeen I was hunched over a record player learning by copying the solos of Eric Clapton, hours every evening practicing my B string vibrato. That very moment in 1965 two thousand miles away a young man name of John Coltrane was playing saxophone. I didn’t know or care. It took forty more years of listening to a million other things before I could connect with that.

    I tried recently to go live music, concerts gigs and festivals, but physically the logistics and discomfort are bad, and the music sound quality through some giant PA speakers is crap. Then there’s the people standing around posing. No, it’s not for me. My front room sweetspot between the speakers is the best seat in the house. Good enough for me.

    • Thank you for your thoughtful insight, I appreciate any creative criticism.

      I will look into how to jiggle it around a bit to seperate the playing and the appreciation. The initial idea was supposed to be like a jazz bar on 52nd St, New york. small, informal lounge where people (and musicians alike) listen to, talk about and compare their favourite music. But, maybe it is time to change.

      The point that I was trying to make, with regards to modern music was not that is was necessarily “bad” music, it was that the music companies are responsible for their output of music. Artists themselves are responsible for the work that they put out into the world, and if you glamourise alcoholism and drug abuse, then I believe that something is not right. Maybe I should publish a follow up, to clarify.

      Thank you again, and it is a pleasure to hear your point of view.

  2. Nice idea, a lounge where you can drop in. When I was working, in and around “knowledge management”, everyone was promoting the drop-in coffee-shops but I like the NY bar idea better. Maybe you need a jukebox. WordPress allows audiostreaming ( cheap account upgrade needed of course) .
    Let me not monopolise the blog – I’ll fix myself a drink. Cheers

  3. Really enjoyed this whole conversation. I am from a time when lyrics were as important as the music and the beat. I know that sometimes the rhythm and syncopation are what draw listeners to “popular” music, but it’s refreshing to hear singers and musicians (i.e. Michael Buble, Harry Conick Jr., etc.) that are bringing/or have revived “listening” to music back to the forefront. What do you think?

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s